Allen, J. P., Columbus, M., & Fertig, J. (1995). Assessment in alcoholism treatment: An overview. In J. P. Allen, & M. Columbus (Eds.) Assessing alcohol problems: a guide for clinicians and researchers. NIAAA treatment handbook series 4. Bethesda, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes

American Bar Association Judicial Division. 2001. Standards Relating to Trial Courts: Standard 2.77: Procedures in Drug Treatment Courts. Chicago, IL: Approved by the ABA House of Delegates at ABA Annual Meeting.

American Prosecutors Research Institute, National Traffic Law Center. May 2002. Admissibility of Chemical Test Refusals. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute.

Beirness, D.J. 2001. Best Practices for Alcohol Interlock Programs. Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation. Belenko, S.R. June 2001. Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review 2001 Update. New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, NCJ 190414.=

Berning, A., Beirness, D., Hedlund, J. and Jones, R., 2007. Traffic Safety Facts: Breath Test Refusals, DOT HS 810-871. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Berning, A., Compton, R., Vegega, M., Beirness, D., Hudlund, J., Jones, R., and Nichols, J., 2008. Refusal of Intoxication Testing: A Report to Congress, DOT HS 811 098. Washington, DC. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Breckenridge, J.F., Winfree, Jr., L.T., Maupin, J.R., and Clason, D.L. Spring 2000. Drunk drivers, DWI “drug court” treatment, and recidivism: Who fails? In: Justice Research and Policy, 2(1), 87–105.

Brooker, R.G. Evaluation of Alternatives to Incarceration for Repeat Drunken Driving, Phase One. 2001. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, and Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services.

Brunson, W. and Knighten, P., 2005. Strategies for Addressing the DWI Offender: 10 Promising Sentencing Practices. DOT HS 809 850. Washington, D.C., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Caldwell-Aden, L., 2011. Case Studies of Community-Based Self-Sufficient DWI Programs, DOT HS 811 300, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Casey, P. Warren, R. and Elek, J., 2011. Using Offender Risk and Needs Assessment Information at Sentencing, Guidance for Courts from a National Working Group. Williamsburg, Virginia. National Center for State Courts.

Chang, I., Gregory, C., and Lapham, S.C. 2002. Review of Screening Instruments and Procedures for Evaluating DWI Offenders. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

Cleary, J. January 2003. Controlling Repeat DWI Offenders with Staggered Sentencing. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department policy brief.

Clements, W. 2002. How Many Come Back? DWI Offender Recidivism in Vermont. The Vermont Bar Journal, 28(1). Cole, T.J. May 25, 2002. Many Drunks Get Off Easy. The Albuquerque Journal, special section, p.15.

Cole, T.J. May 25, 2002. Not All Licenses Yanked. The Albuquerque Journal, special section, p. 20.

Cooper, C.S., Arthur, A., Costello, E. et al. October 2001 (final draft). 2000 Drug Court Survey Report: Program Operations, Services and Participant Perspectives; Volume II: Part II: DWI Drug Courts. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, American University.

Courtright, K.E., Berg, B.L., and Mutchnick, R.J. 2000. Rehabilitation in the new machine? Exploring drug and alcohol use and variables related to success among DWI offenders under electronic monitoring: Some preliminary outcome results. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(3): 293–311.

Crowe, A.H., Sydney, L., Bancroft, P., and Lawrence, B. 2002. Offender Supervision with Electronic Technology. Lexington, KY: American Probation and Parole Association. Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. 1997. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals and Drug Court Standards Committee.

DeYoung, D.J. 1997. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction, 92(8): 989–997.

DeYoung, D.J. May 2002. An Evaluation of the Implementation of Ignition Interlocks in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Drug Court Partnership. March 2002. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs and Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts.

Ensuring Solutions to Alcohol Problems, The George Washington University Medical Center. The Active Ingredients of Effective Alcohol Treatment (PDF). June 2003.

Fell, J., Lacey, J., Sole Brito, C. and Voas, R., 2006. A Guide to Sentencing DWI Offenders, 2nd Edition, DOT HS 810 555. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Glaze, L.E. 2002. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2001. Washington, DC, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Guerin, P. September 2002. Evaluation of the Bernalillo County Metropolitan DWI/Drug Court. Albuquerque, NM: The University of New Mexico Institute for Social Research, Center for Applied Research and Analysis.

Hawkins, A. July 22, 2003. Ignition interlock system order must come from trial court. The Legal Intelligencer, p.1.

Hedlund, J.H. and Beirness, D.J., 2007 Use of Warrants for Breath Test Refusal: Case Studies, DOT HS 810 852. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Hedlund, J., and McCartt, A. 2002. Drunk Driving: A Roadmap for Progress. Trumbull, CT: Preusser Research Group, Inc. Lifesavers workshop June 9, 2002.

Hedlund, J., and McCartt, A. May 2002. Drunk Driving: Seeking Additional Solutions. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

Hendricks, L. June 4, 2003. Study: drug court cheaper than jail time. Arizona Daily Sun.

Hon, J., 2004. Ensuring Solutions to Alcohol Problems: Finding Common Ground: Improving Highway Safety with More Effective Interventions for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC; George Washington University Medical Center.

Jensen, D., and Reavy, P. January 29, 2001. Few DWI cases in Utah ever go to court. Desert News, p. A1.

Jones, R., Joksch, H., and Wiliszowski, C. (1991) Implied Consent Refusal Impact, DOT HS 807 765. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Jones, R.K., and Lacey, J.H. 2000. State of Knowledge of Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Research on Repeat DWI Offenders. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Jones, R.K., Lacey, J.H., and Wiliszowski, C.H. 1998. Problems and Solutions in DWI Enforcement Systems. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Jones, R. and Nichols, J. (2012) Breath Test Refusals and Their Effect on DWI Prosecutions, DOT HS 811 551. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Jones, R.K., Wiliszowski, C.H., and Lacey, J.H. 1999. Examination of DWI Conviction Rate Procedures. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Judicial Education Center website. 2003. DWI Sentencing Calculator for Magistrates.

Judicial Education Center website. 2003. DWI Sentencing Calculator for Municipal Judges.

Keith, A.L. 2002. Specialized and Problem-Solving Courts; Trends in 2002: DWI Courts. Arlington, VA: National Center for State Courts.

Langworthy, R.H. 1999. Dispositions of DWI Arrestees: Anchorage, 1996. Anchorage, AK: Justice Center.

Loudenburg, Roland, Drube, Gregg and Leonardson, Gary. 2010. South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Program Evaluation Findings Report. Salem, SD: Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC.

Malenfant, J.E., Van Houten, R., and Jonah, B. 2002. A Study to measure the incidence of driving under suspension in the Greater Moncton Area. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(4): 439–447.

Mann, R.E., Smart, R.G., Stoduto, G., Adlaf, E.M., Vingilis, E., Beirness, D., and Lamble, R. 2000. Changing drinking- driving behaviour: The effects of Ontario’s administrative driver’s license suspension law. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 16(2): 1141–1142.

Marlowe, D., 2010. Introductory Handbook for DWI Court Program Evaluations.The National Center for DWI  Courts,  Alexandria,  Virginia.

Marques, P.R., Bjerre, B., Dussault, C., Voas, R.B., Beirness, D.J., Marples, I.R., and Rauch, W.R. 2001. Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices, I: Position Paper. Oosterhout, Netherlands.

Marques, P. and McKnight, A., 2007. Evaluating Transdermal Alcohol Measuring Devices, DOT HS 810 875, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Martinez, A.I. and Eisenberg, M. 2002. Overview of Drug Courts in Texas. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.

McCartt, A. Spring 2002. Enhanced sanctions for higher BACs: Addressing the high-risk offender. Impaired Driving Update. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.

McCartt, A. and Shabanova, V. 2002. Effects of Enhanced Sanctions for High BAC DWI Offenders on Case Dispositions and Rates of Recidivism. Trumbull, CT: Preusser Research Group, Inc.

McCartt, A.T. 2001. Evaluation of Enhanced Sanctions for Higher BACs: Summary of States’ Laws. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

McCartt, A.T., Geary, L.L., and Nissen, W.J. 2002. Observational Study of the Extent of Driving While Suspended for Alcohol Impaired Driving. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Minnesota Department of Corrections. February 2002. Remote Electronic Alcohol Monitoring 2002 Report. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances webpage. 1999. NCUTLO DWI Model Law.

National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics. 2003. Supporting the Drug Court Process: What You Need to Know for Effective Decision-making and Program Evaluation. U.S. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, NCJ 197259.

National Drug Court Institute. March 1999. DWI/Drug Courts: Defining a National Strategy [Monograph Series 1]. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. April 2000. Evaluation of vehicle impoundment on suspended and revoked drivers in California. Traffic Tech, 218. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2002. Fatality Analysis Reporting System(FARS). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Spring 2002. Mecklenburg County DWI Court. Traffic Safety Digest. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1990. Impact of Court Monitoring on DWI Adjudication. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 1996. A Guide to Sentencing DWI Offenders. Washington, DC: NHTSA and NIAA.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. March 2000. Repeat DWI Offenders are an elusive target. Traffic Tech, 217. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. April 2000. Evaluation of vehicle impoundment on suspended and revoked drivers in California. Traffic Tech, 218. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. April 2002. State Legislative Fact Sheet: Vehicle and License Plate Sanctions Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, January 2008. Repeat Intoxicated Driver Laws, Traffic Safety Facts – Laws DOT HS 810 879. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

National Transportation Safety Board. 2000. Safety Report: Actions to Reduce Fatalities, Injuries, and Crashes Involving the Hard Core Drinking Driver. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board.

Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse. May 2003. Cost Benefits/Costs Avoided Reported by Drug Court Programs. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

Peters, R.H., and Peyton, E. 1998. Guideline for Drug Courts on Screening and Assessment. Washington, DC: American University Justice Programs Office and U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.

Pretrial Intoxicated Driver Intervention Grant Program, Annual Evaluation Report. December 2002. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Transportation Division of Investment Management, Bureau of Transportation Safety.

Report of the Municipal Court DWI Task Force. 2000. Kansas City, MO: Kansas City Council.

Richardson, L.E., and Houston, D.J. 2002. Deterring Drinking-and-Driving: State DWI Laws and Perceptions of Punishment Costs. Chicago, IL: Prepared for presentation at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 22–25.

Robertson, R.D., and Simpson, H.M. December 2002. DWI System Improvements for Dealing with Hard Core Drinking Drivers: Adjudication and Sanctioning. Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.

Robertson, R.D., and Simpson, H.M. June 2002. DWI System Improvements for Dealing with Hard Core Drinking Drivers: Prosecution. Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.

Robertson, R.D., and Simpson, H.M. July 2003. DWI System Improvements for Dealing with Hard Core Drinking Drivers: Monitoring. Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.

Robertson, R. D., Vanlaar W. G. M., and Simpson, H. M. (2006). Ignition Interlocks From Research to Practice: A Primer for Judges. Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Rodgers, A. 1994. Effect of Minnesota’s license plate impoundment law on recidivism of multiple DWI violators. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 10(2): 127–133.

Roman, J., Townsend, W., and Bhati, A.S. 2003. Recidivism Rates for Drug Court Graduates: Nationally Based Estimates. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

Substance Abuse Treatment For Adults In The Justice System: A Treatment Improvement Protocol. 2005. U.S. Dept HHS. CSAT

Schwilke, Eugene W., Dos Santos, Maria Isabel Sampaio, and Logan, Barry K. 2009. Changing Patterns of Drug and Alcohol Use in Fatally Injured Drivers in Washington State. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51(5) p.1191-1198

Siegal, H.A. et al. 2000. The Hardcore Drunk Driving Offender. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Stockholm, Sweden.

Tauber J. and Huddleston C.W. March 1999. DWI/Drug Courts: Defining a National Strategy. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.

The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility. 1997. Combating Hardcore Drunk Driving: A Sourcebook of Promising Strategies, Laws and Programs. The National Hardcore Drunk Driver Project. Washington, DC: The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility.

The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility. 2003. Combating Hardcore Drunk Driving: A Sourcebook of Promising Strategies, Laws and Programs. The National Hardcore Drunk Driver Project. Washington, DC: The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility.

The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility. 1999. From the Grassroots to a National Agenda: Community Forums Report —Issues and Insights on Hardcore Drunk Driving. The National Hardcore Drunk Driver Project. Washington, DC: The Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility.

Traffic Injury Research Foundation. Screening Assessment and Treatment of DWI Offenders: A Guide for Justice Professionals and Policy Makers. 2008.

Voas, R.B. 1995. Can administrative programs control the persistent drinking driver? Strategies for dealing with the persistent drinking-driver. Transportation Research Circular, 437: 52–56.

Voas, R.B. Summer 2002. Why are we so slow in applying technology to the control of drinking drivers? Impaired Driving Update. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.

Voas, R.B., and Fisher, D.A. 2001. Court procedures for handling intoxicated drivers. Alcohol Health and Research World, 25: 32–42.

Wagenaar, A.C., Zobek, T.S., Williams, G.D. et al. 2000. Effects of DWI Control Efforts: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1960–1991. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health.

Walsh, JM, Flegel R., Atkins R., Cangianelli LA., Cooper C., Welsh C., Kerns, TJ. 2005. Drug and Alcohol Use Among Drivers Admitted to a Level-1 Trauma Center. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 37(5), 894-901.

Weinrath, M., and Gartrell, J. 2001. Specific Deterrence and Sentence Length: The Case of Drunk Drivers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17(2): 105–122.

Wiliszowski, C.; Fell, j. McKnight, S. and Tippets, S. (2011) An Evaluation of Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders, DOT HS 811 446, Washington, DC; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Wiliszowski, C.H., Jones, R.K., and Lacey, J.H. June 2003. Examining the Effectiveness of Utah’s Law Allowing for Telephonic Testimony at ALR Hearings. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Wiliszowski, C.H., Rodriguez-Iglesias, C.E., Lacey J.H., Jones, R.K., and Cyr, E. 2001. A Study of Outstanding DWI Warrants. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Winfree, Jr., L.T. and Giever, D.M. January–February 2000. Classifying Driving-While-Intoxicated Offenders: The Experiences of a Citywide DWI Drug Court (New Mexico). Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(1): 13–21.

Zwicker, T., Hedlund, J., and Northrup, V. (2005) Breath Test Refusals in DWI Enforcement: An Interim Report, DOT HS 809 876. Washington, DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.